No guarantees I will actually do much with it but it’s there.

The premise of the game is: you are in Google Street View somewhere. You can’t see any metadata, just the panoramic photos around you. You can click around wherever you want (unless you’re trapped in a stationary panorama, which occasionally happens). You have a map open in the corner of the screen, and your goal is to drop a pin on that map and identify where you are in street view. Perfect score is 5000 points. Thinking you’re on a mountain in Colorado and clicking there when you are actually in Antarctica is 0 points. Not that that’s ever happened to me.

We usually play by our own hardcore set of rules: no outside information. No googling the name of anything. Just what you can see in front of you and what you can figure out from looking at the little map in the corner. (My co-players look at Google maps, which are the same thing. But without doing any searching, just scrolling around and zooming.)

Normally you get dropped down 5 different places in the world and have to locate where you are on a map for each of those. 5 random places that happen to have street view. This includes a lot of places, and excludes a lot. There’s very little in China, and only a handful of African countries have street view. Austria has plenty; Germany very little. For some reason we show up in Singapore a LOT, to the point that it’s easy to recognize just from the neighborhoods or highways. There’s lots of street view in the Baltics, in the Balkans, most of Europe in fact, Scandinavia, lots of South America (pity the player who knows little more than that they’re “in Brazil”…), lots of Southeast Asia, Japan, Australia & NZ… Luxembourg and Andorra, but I don’t think Liechtenstein and Monaco… never been to the Vatican either.

There are special maps with themes you can choose from instead of the general “anywhere in the world”. Like “I Saw The Sign” where you will be plopped down in front of a sign which is the name of the town you’re at. If you don’t google, that doesn’t help as much as you might think! Or “Where’s That McDonalds” where you’re plopped down in front of a McDonalds somewhere in the world.

And who could forget “Bunkers of Albania” or “Extra-Rural Mongolia.”

I’ve learned so incredibly much about what the world looks like this way. (Not what it sounds like, or smells like, but at least what it looks like.) I’ve learned all kinds of tells. (Like: if it’s got runic letters like thorn and edh, then it’s probably Iceland, unless it’s all islandy-mountainy, in which case it’s the Faroe Islands.) Or: if you think you’re in Scandanavia, then if you see umlaut ä and ö you’re in Sweden (or Finland but Finnish looks nothing like Swedish), if you see ø and ash, you’re either in Norway or Denmark. If it looks scenic and gorgeous, it’s Norway. If it looks like it could be part of the boring suburban/rural Midwest USA, it’s Denmark. (Sorry, Denmark. You’re super boring looking next to Norway.)

More tells… if you see Cyrillic, you could be in a number of places. Russian and Bulgarian use the same alphabet. Bulgarian usually looks tidier and more European, and has more Cyrillic/Latin double script signs. Ukrainian uses the letter I, which Russia doesn’t. Mongolia has lots of double vowels, and occasionally uses a character that looks like a theta. Balkan Cyrillic-users like Serbia have a few special letters which look like they have a small letter b attached to them.

Good luck telling Malaysian and Indonesian apart, I sure can’t. Burmese looks like Elvish. If it looks like it can’t make up its mind whether it’s French or Spanish, it might be Catalan and you might be in that part of Spain. If you see signs that are bilingual in French and in some crazy language you can’t identify at all, you’re probably in Brittany looking at Breton. If you see Italian, you’re definitely in Italy, unless you’re in an Italian speaking part of Switzerland, or if you’re in Albania looking at signs which are there for tourists.

URLs are often a dead giveaway, but if you see one on a truck there’s always the chance it drove there from another country…. Flags are a godsend, if you know your flags.

Sorry, I’m getting lost in the weeds. Anyway it’s a wonderful adventure, and it’s one of the most educational games I’ve ever played.

Also I have vacation destinations in mind I never would have otherwise. Albania seems chill and beautiful and nice for tourists. (Plus you’re never far from a cold war bunker in case you need to hide from invading NATO forces.. or these days, Russia). Croatia and Slovenia are gorgeous too. If I want absolute mind-blowing beauty, Norway or even the Faroes. The Baltics seem really nice too! I’d totally chill in Latvia. Outside of Europe, well, I haven’t gotten a real “I want to be a tourist here” vibe out of any African countries, I’m afraid. Though South Africa and friends (Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho etc), Ghana, Kenya, and Senegal all look interesting. Thailand seems super pleasant. So does Chile.

There are so many stories I could tell (and screenshots I could share) about the weird, weird stuff we’ve seen out there on worldwide Street view, or the epic successes we’ve had in some of the unlikeliest circumstances (and the epic failures, as well).

It’s so good. You can play once a day without a paid membership or as many times as you want with one.

Highly recommended.

Me:

It’s a grim time in the world right now. War abroad, inflation everywhere, and a rollback of human rights at home at the hands of an increasingly fascist right wing movement. I don’t have any glib comment on that, it’s just what’s happening.

In my own world, I’ve been to the hospital for a couple procedures, none of which was dangerous or momentous. Just getting a little older, stuff needs to be looked at and taken care of.

I’m in a new job right now. Still web dev. Ruby on Rails, primarily backend work. Good people.

I am looking back at this site, where I had fantasies of making it a web site full of art and illustration, but the sad truth is I don’t do enough art or illustration these days to make much of it. And that’s OK. I don’t have to Be A Real Artist, I don’t have to try to be like the artists I know and admire on the internet. I can just live my life and do art if and when I feel like it, for me. And if I decide to share it that’s fine too.

A lot of people are getting off of Twitter because they think a site run by Elon Musk is going to be even worse than a site run by Jack Dorsey, and they’re probably right. There’s no clear better place to be right now. Mastodon is neat but suffers from the fact that it’s trying to be completely server-neutral, like email, but also have individual servers be small communities, like old fashioned web forums. That makes it confusing to know how to deal with it. Do I need one address or many? Should I post on one topic, germane to my home server, or whatever I want?

It seems like the more successful servers are more community-based, or at least, there seem to be some community-based servers which are very pleased with themselves…. hackers.town is one full of Self Identified Hacker People. Seems nice enough; I ended up following/followed by people there a while back, it’s fine but despite being a programmer I am not a Self Identified Hacker Person. There’s a really nice server for esperantists at esperanto.masto.host. Good people there.

There’s also slowsocial.us, which I’m on. Search for my name if you want to connect there. There seems to be very very little activity so far. As in, I’ve literally never seen anyone I follow there post.

I guess that’ll do for now. Just thought I’d post to the ol’ blog.

I would add: Static Site Generators don’t really change anything from wordpress-style blogs. They’re an implementation detail. The difference between a static site generator versus a wordpress blog is no different than a MySQL-backed blog vs a Sqlite or Postgres-backed blog. In either case, the content is an abstraction and a machine generates the final product on an as-needed basis, and you are isolated from the results and possibly do not understand the process by which they are generated and you do not feel in control of it. And you are at the mercy of the makers of the software.

So just go with WordPress if you like, you’re not a second class citizen. You’re getting the non-cached results of operations on a relational database instead of the cached results of operations on a bag of files.

I mean, unless you really like having that bag of files and operating on it instead of operating through textboxes on a relational database. In that case, go for it!

Of course, the elephant in my personal room is “how does Tiddlywiki fit into all of this?” And the answer to that elephant is as always “it’s complicated.” A tiddlywiki is not plain hand-edited HTML. And yet, it is a single file, which you edit and save, and you put it on the web, and there is no separation or virtualization between “the thing you edit” and “the thing you publish.” There is no content management system or integration pipeline to lose; there is no database backing it; it is itself. In this sense it is very like the early, pre-blog web. Oh yes, and its default format is a garden rather than a diary, though like the early web you can use it for both.

Anyways, good article.

We’ll see if the obsession persists.

I had heard of them a whole lot of years ago, and I knew that some people got really obsessed with them, but I’d never looked into them very deeply. But a couple weeks ago at work, I needed a tool to help figure out how some pieces of code worked together. I was hoping for a mind mapping tool, and I searched for such.

One of the things I came across was TiddlyMap, which is a mind mapping tool built on top of TiddlyWiki. This got me to look at TiddlyWikis, and I soon had downloaded one and used it to take care of my “understand linked pieces of code” need, without any mapping tool used at all. But I was intrigued.

aI have a poor memory and I’ve sometimes gotten confused about when things happened at what point in my life, like, what year of my life. I had created a file called “timeline.txt” a long time ago to note down what year major things happened. I decided to tiddlywikify it. It worked extraordinarily well and taught me a lot about tiddlywikis. If I had kept working on it I think I could pretty easily have turned it into a genealogy tool too, though I didn’t go that far.

The thing I did come to understand from that is how good it is at helping organize a bunch of unrelated thoughts. Or rather, put them down without stopping to think about organizing them — let them grow as a sort of rhizomatic cloud as needed.

As another project, I started creating a little resource about Esperanto, basically all the things that I would want to tell a friend who wanted to know something about all this “Esperanto” business I was blathering about. It grew pretty quickly into a nice little file, which I’ve uploaded here. I’ll keep updating it as I feel like it. Check it out if you would, and drop a comment if you like it.

Last Thursday I was playing Dungeons & Dragons over Skype and Roll20, and on a whim I decided to start keeping track of what we were doing with a tiddlywiki. I got a lot written down; it was pretty cool. I also quickly installed TiddlyMap in there, dropped in a map of the area we were exploring, which the DM had provided, and started annotating the stuff on that map! (TiddlyMap is intended for mind mapping but you can lock entries to spots on a grid, and if you put an image in the background of your map, then hey-ho, you’ve suddenly got a map and key.)

I’ve been using a tiddlywiki to take quick notes at work, and keep some private “what am I doing and what do I need to do” information.

There are a lot of cool and unique qualities to tiddlywikis, which is why I’m kind of obsessed with them. One virtue is the fact that they’re incredibly fluid and easy to use; you can use them to “build out” your knowledge bit by bit. Another is the fact that they are, by default, entirely self-contained: a tiddlywiki is a single html file which is the app, data, and everything, all combined together. Another is the fact that tiddlywikis are mostly written in themselves: that is, when you build things with a tiddlywiki you are mostly using the same tools that the makers of tiddlywiki used to create it themselves. It feels like smalltalk (which is mostly written in smalltalk) or emacs (which is mostly written in emacs lisp).

But there are downsides. First off, if you are going to try and get clever with it, it can be very difficult to figure out exactly how it works under the hood. The text you type into a tiddler can have several different kinds of markup in it which operate in several different ways, and coming to understand how they interact with each other can be hair-tearing-out painful. Basically there are easy and hard ways to do things and it’t not always obvious what the easy way is. The documentaiton is pretty good, but not always good enough. And if you want to search for solutions, you aren’t going to find a lot outside of the tiddlywiki google group.

Another downside is saving… since a tiddlywiki is a bunch of javascript in an html file, and a bunch of javascript in an html file does not have the ability to write back to that same html file, saving your work can be awkward! There are numerous ways to work around this awkwardness but many of them are pains in the butt on their own. Myself, I tend to use an app called “tiddlydesktop” on the desktop, cause it’s super easy, and I keep my stuff backed up a git repository which I can check out from wherever I happen to be.

Still… I’m obsessed. Even though I’ve gone down a lot of rabbitholes and wasted a lot of time… they’re so cool.

Tiddlywikis…. they are awesome.